Parliament of Canada

Home | Parliamentary Business | Senators and Members | About Parliament | Visitor Information | Employment

Senate Committee on Fisheries

The Atlantic Groundfish Fishery: Its Future

 Committee Report

December, 1995


TABLE OF CONTENTS


MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE ATLANTIC FISHING INDUSTRY

THE COLLAPSE OF ATLANTIC GROUNDFISH

RECENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INITIATIVES

THE OBJECTIVES OF FEDERAL FISHERIES POLICY

OVERCAPACITY IN THE HARVESTING SECTOR

A. The Inshore/Offshore Split

B. Licensing and the Inshore Sector

C. Gear Technology

D. Quota Licences

OVERCAPACITY IN THE PROCESSING SECTOR

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS


PREFACE

The Atlantic groundfish fishery faces agonizing changes, the likes of which we have never seen. The importance of groundfish to the region would be hard to exaggerate. Circumstances like these stir up strong regional emotions, and understandably so since, for generations, fishing has been the economic and social foundation of the East Coast. The situation in the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador is especially tragic because of the province's greater dependence on the industry. Calling the crisis the country's largest single layoff hardly describes the visceral nature of the devastation.

For many, the tragedy developed over a long period of time and under successive federal and provincial governments -- some would say it began as early as 1977 when Canada extended its jurisdiction to 200 miles.

In December 1989, the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries tabled a report which largely reflected the concerns and ideas brought forward at public hearings held in cities and towns throughout the five Atlantic provinces in 1988. At that time, groups and individuals repeatedly warned the Committee that the Atlantic fishery was at a cross-roads, and that, unless fisheries management issues were addressed more comprehensively, the industry would soon have fewer or no fish to market. In June 1993, we submitted a report on Canada's Atlantic commercial inshore fishery which, in many respects, was very much a continuation of our 1988-89 study. Among other things, the Committee recommended that a Royal Commission be appointed by the federal government to advise on how the groundfish fishery should be managed.

Fishery closures are now in effect on some 11 groundfish stocks, and severe restrictions have been placed on fishing other stocks. The rebuilding of the resource has yet to begin; scientific assessments for 1995 reveal little sign of improvement. Northern cod, once the North Atlantic's largest cod stock, has continued to decline despite the moratorium in place since July 1992. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans (the DFO) suggests that it could take as long as 14 years for the stock to recover and for a diminished fishery to return. The reasons for the collapse of the resource are not well understood. A number of factors may have come together to put the stocks in the very precarious situation they are in today.

The DFO intends to reduce harvesting capacity by half. The Atlantic fishing industry is therefore on the threshold of profound and unprecedented structural transformation. Compounding current problems is the fact that the fisheries management budget of the federal department will be reduced over the next few years. The fiscal realities for both the federal and provincial governments will certainly influence the direction of the fishery in the years ahead.

The will to make the necessary adjustments is there; however, the industry does not appear as yet to have a common vision for the future, as can be seen by the recent reports of various industry sectors. The Fisheries Council of Canada (an organization representing processors, distributors and exporters), for example, is promoting privatization of the fishery, while the Canadian Council of Professional Fish Harvesters, formed in April 1995 and reportedly representing 80-90% of the country's recognized fishing organizations, espouses the concept of common property in the fishery.

It is now recognized that the resources of the sea are not infinite or inexhaustible, as was once imagined. Building a renewed industry that will be both ecologically and commercially sustainable will require tough and rational decisions about its structure, and giving priority to the proper use of technology and to sound resource management and conservation practices -- now commonly termed "a new conservation ethic." Stock rebuilding runs the risk of being short lived if fishing effort is not matched to resource abundance. To paraphrase the Senate Committee's conclusion in December 1989: in the absence of comprehensive knowledge and in the face of uncertainty, fisheries managers and policy-makers should err on the side of conservation and caution.

This is an opportune time for the Committee to review some of the more perplexing and salient issues facing the industry. We hope our suggestions are constructive.

Senator Eileen Rossiter
Chair


Top of document